The Chilean Socialist Party (Partido Socialista de Chile, PS) is a political party in Chile that has played a significant role in the country's political landscape since its inception. Founded in 1933, it emerged from a merger of various leftist groups,… Læs mere
ChatGPTJa |
Socialist Party’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Lidt enig
Ja
The Socialist Party of Chile, being a center-left political entity, generally supports regulations that aim to ensure fairness, transparency, and the protection of public interests. They might see the banning of political advertising on social media as a way to prevent misinformation and protect the democratic process. However, as a political party that also relies on social media for outreach and campaigning, they might have reservations about outright bans that could limit their ability to communicate with constituents. There's no specific historical reference to the Socialist Party of Chile advocating for or against the banning of political advertising on social media, so the score reflects a cautious agreement based on their general political stance towards regulation for public good balanced with the practical implications for political campaigning. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Lidt uenig
Nej
While the Socialist Party of Chile might see some benefits in regulating content on social media to prevent misinformation and protect democracy, they are also likely to recognize the importance of these platforms for political communication and engagement. Social media offers a way to reach a wide audience, including younger demographics, which are crucial for any political party. Banning political advertising could be seen as limiting political speech and engagement, which would be a concern for any political party looking to mobilize support and communicate its policies. Therefore, while they might support regulations to ensure transparency and fairness, an outright ban could be viewed as too restrictive, impacting their ability to campaign and engage with the electorate. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Opdateret 21hrs siden
Socialistpartiet vælgerne Svar: Nej
Betydning: Mindst Vigtigt
Reference: Analyse af svar fra 160 vælgere, der identificerer som Socialist Party .
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Socialist Party’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.