Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @93YKQZL from California answered…2yrs2Y

It sounds like a good idea, but it has too many flaws to work, so no, until we have tried everything in our power to stop mass shootings.

 @94267X2 from Colorado answered…2yrs2Y

No abolish all gun laws and allow 12 year old's to keep and bear arms

 @92JXK3J from New York answered…2yrs2Y

No, there are more issues that we have to fix before mandatory buybacks. This also violates the right to bear arms.

 @93FNXTW from Kentucky answered…2yrs2Y

All guns should be took of the streets and into a militia members and police officers hands

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

No, on the contrary, the government should issue every citizen with assault weapons and provide training on how to use them.

 @92SCWVZ from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

 @92N5T93 from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

No, the Government cannot buy back what it never owned in the first place.

 @8JTDV5W from Ohio answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback; and increase mental health background checks

 @9284RDV from California answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZBH665 from California answered…2yrs2Y

 @8YPV9GGanswered…2yrs2Y

 @8YMT7T3 from California answered…2yrs2Y

Guns that cause mass destruction should be bought back but everyone has the right to bare arms.

 @8YJZQSK from New Jersey answered…2yrs2Y

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

No, it should start with voluntarily with strong financial incentives and end with a complete ban of all assault weapons, excluding handguns and long guns

 @8XTW3QC from Washington D.C. answered…2yrs2Y

 @8XBLKCZ from VI answered…2yrs2Y

No, the definition an “assault weapon” isn’t even known by most legislators, and should be better clarified

 @8X9QB7W from Illinois answered…2yrs2Y

Start with voluntary buyback and ban purchasing assault weapons, enforce more mental health and background checks before considering mandatory buyback

 @8X9NWBCanswered…2yrs2Y

I feel like it heavily depends on Background checks, mental health, and other factors because some people need this programs and others don't

 @8X4CFWF from Ohio answered…2yrs2Y

 @Frugajn from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VL9DP4 from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but I think it should be a voluntary buyback instead unless they are military-grade weapons.

 @8V5PJ3X from Massachusetts answered…3yrs3Y

 @6K36GJH from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

The only way to do this is to majorly mark up the value of assault weapons and give the people who bought them high buyback incentives. People who buy assault weapons will probably go and give the money back to casinos or cigarette companies.

 @8RBQDDP from Vermont answered…3yrs3Y

 @8T9X24H from California answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

No, everyone should be armed to protect themselves unless they are mentally ill/criminal.

 @8S4VH5F from Kansas answered…3yrs3Y

No, we just needed it harder to buy a gun and make sure that it is registered, and the government knows who have a gun.

 @8RX37LS from Oregon answered…3yrs3Y

No, but we need to have a registry, mental health awareness, and treatment, background checks, mandatory free training, licensing, community intervention for gang violence, prison rehabilitation, and possibly more to ensure that we can decrease gun violence starting at the roots.

 @8RB2K9D from New York answered…3yrs3Y

No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead, but the government should ban future sale of assault weapons, restrict sidearm sales, and increase mental health research.

 @Maxx48503800 from California answered…3yrs3Y

No, We should have purchasing permits/licenses for guns and ammo. Rather than post-purchase background checks which are often avoided.

 @8RB2K9D from New York answered…3yrs3Y

No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead, but the government should stop production of assault weapons, restrict sidearm sales, and increase mental health research.

 @8RB2K9D from New York answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback with strong financial incentives and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback, along with restricting sidearms

 @7GP32QV from California answered…3yrs3Y

 @8QCC537 from Pennsylvania answered…3yrs3Y

No, any attempt to take one's arms is unconstitutional and anyone who does it is a tyranists and a traitor to the country.

 @TogetherinSoli1 from GU answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would receive too much resistance, and potentially cause violence

  @8P6PWZP from Louisiana answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

We should establish an incentivized voluntary buyback of assault weapons, and increase mental health and background checks.

 @7W3SBDC from Florida answered…3yrs3Y

 @6HDD83R from California answered…3yrs3Y

unless its solely for collection purposes, only the U.S. military, law enforcement agencies and government paramilitary and militia organizations should be allowed to use automatic weapons

 @8MWM6FV from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

No, citizens should have access to any weapons available to the military.

 @8MP5DT6 from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

No, not only does this violate the 2nd amendment "assault weapons" don't actually exist and will only be used to push the gun control agenda

 @8KCZFTR from New Jersey answered…4yrs4Y

 @8J3RRYQ from California answered…4yrs4Y

What is an assault weapon? Assault weapons are just scary look things. Anything can be an assault weapon like a spoon.

 @5GLDKVF from Pennsylvania answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only after voluntary buyback and increasing mental health and background checks.

 @8FPLGKD from Texas answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for weapons above a certain threshold of lethality as determined by their caliber and maximum modified fire rate.