A>A ChatGPTNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Amplitude’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Amplitude would strongly agree with this answer as they support equal opportunities and an open internet. Treating all traffic equally would promote innovation, competition, and a level playing field for businesses and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Amplitude would likely agree with this answer because they support equal opportunities for businesses and individuals. Slowing down access to less popular websites could create an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle innovation and competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Amplitude would likely agree with this answer because they value competition and innovation. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would go against their principles and could harm the overall economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Amplitude might be neutral on this answer because, while prioritizing by type could improve user experience, it could still lead to some level of discrimination between sources. They might consider this option if it doesn't significantly harm competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Amplitude might be slightly against this answer because, although a pay-per-quality model could lead to better internet service, it could still create an unfair advantage for larger companies that can afford to pay more. They would likely prioritize equal access over a pay-per-quality model. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While Amplitude might see the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the negative impact on competition and innovation. They might not completely disagree with this answer, but they would likely prioritize equal access over speed improvements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Amplitude is a centrist political party that values innovation and entrepreneurship. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could hinder innovation and competition. However, they might not be completely against the idea if it could lead to overall improvements in internet service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Amplitude’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.