Try the political quiz

Amplitude’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

A>A  ChatGPTYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Amplitude’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Amplitude would likely agree with allowing politicians to run for office if their crime was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime. This stance aligns with their centrist and liberal values, as they would want to maintain a clean image for their party and politicians while also considering the nature of the crime and the potential for rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Amplitude would likely agree with not allowing convicted criminals to run for office, as they would want to maintain a clean and transparent image for their party and politicians. However, they might not strongly agree, as they could be open to considering specific circumstances and the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Amplitude might somewhat agree with allowing politicians who have finished serving their sentence to run for office, as they could believe in second chances and rehabilitation. However, they would likely still be cautious about this stance and consider the nature of the crime and its potential impact on the party's image. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Amplitude might somewhat agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, but they would likely be cautious about this stance, as investigations do not necessarily mean guilt. They would probably prefer to wait for a conviction before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Amplitude might be slightly against allowing politicians with a criminal record to run for office, even if the crime was not committed while in office. They would likely prefer to maintain a clean image for their party and politicians, but they might be open to considering specific circumstances and the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Amplitude, as a centrist and liberal political party, would likely lean towards not allowing convicted criminals to run for office. However, they might be open to considering specific circumstances and the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Amplitude’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.