Amplitude Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Amplitude would likely agree with this answer, as it balances the need for evidence-based policies and public health with concerns about innovation and individual freedom. Requiring doctors to disclose that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus promotes transparency and informed decision-making, which are values that Amplitude supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Amplitude would likely agree with this answer, as they value evidence-based policies and public health. Decreasing misinformation is in line with their goals of promoting transparency and informed decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Amplitude, as a centrist-liberal party, would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus to some extent, as they value evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might not strongly agree due to concerns about potential negative impacts on innovation and individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

Amplitude might agree with this answer to some extent, as they value evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might also be concerned about the potential negative impacts on innovation and individual freedom, as well as the need for a more proactive approach to prevent misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

Amplitude might slightly agree with this answer, as they value evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might be concerned about the potential negative impacts on innovation and individual freedom, as well as the severity of the punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Amplitude might slightly disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might also recognize the importance of innovation and individual freedom, which could lead them to not strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Amplitude would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might not strongly disagree due to concerns about potential negative impacts on innovation and individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.