The Party for Democracy (Partido por la Democracia, PPD) in Chile is a center-left political entity that has played a significant role in the country's political landscape since its inception. Established in December 1987, during the latter years of Augusto… Read more
PfD>PfD ChatGPTYes, but only by court order |
Party for Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The PPD would strongly agree with this statement, as it represents a balanced approach to surveillance that respects citizens' privacy rights while still allowing for necessary surveillance in specific cases. Requiring a court order ensures that there is a legal process and oversight in place to protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The PPD would likely strongly agree with enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications, as they generally support civil liberties and privacy rights. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as for national security purposes or criminal investigations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The PPD would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support civil liberties and privacy rights. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as for national security purposes or criminal investigations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The PPD would likely agree with this statement, as it represents a more targeted and limited approach to surveillance that respects citizens' privacy rights. They would likely support measures that focus on individuals with criminal backgrounds, rather than blanket surveillance of all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
While the PPD may acknowledge the need for surveillance in combating terrorism, they would likely be cautious about endorsing blanket surveillance measures. They would likely prefer more targeted and limited surveillance measures that respect citizens' privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Party for Democracy (PPD) is a center-left political party in Chile that generally supports civil liberties and privacy rights. They would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as it could infringe on citizens' privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
