The Party for Democracy (Partido por la Democracia, PPD) in Chile is a center-left political entity that has played a significant role in the country's political landscape since its inception. Established in December 1987, during the latter years of Augusto… Read more
PfD>PfD ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
Party for Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
The PPD is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as they have historically supported measures to improve public safety and reduce crime. This targeted approach would align with their goals while minimizing potential privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas
The PPD is likely to agree with both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they have historically supported measures to improve public safety and reduce crime. This answer aligns with their goals and addresses potential privacy concerns by focusing on high crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead
The PPD might agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they have supported measures to improve public safety and reduce crime in the past. However, this answer does not explicitly mention video surveillance, so the score is not as high as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Party for Democracy (PPD) might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support measures to improve public safety. However, there is no strong historical evidence of the PPD specifically advocating for increased video surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens
The PPD might have some concerns about the invasion of privacy of citizens, but they are not known for strongly opposing video surveillance or other public safety measures. Therefore, they are unlikely to strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The PPD is unlikely to strongly disagree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support measures to improve public safety. However, they might have concerns about privacy and civil liberties, which could lead to a somewhat negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3 days ago
Party for Democracy Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 258 voters that identify as Party for Democracy.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
