Try the political quiz

Party for Democracy’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

PfD>PfD  ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Party for Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The PPD would likely agree with this statement, as they have historically supported measures to increase transparency and accountability in politics. For example, they have supported anti-corruption measures and reforms to campaign financing. Disallowing politicians under investigation would be in line with their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The PPD would likely agree with not allowing convicted politicians to run for office, as they generally support transparency and accountability in politics. However, they might not have a strong stance on this issue, as there is no specific historical example to provide a stronger agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The PPD might agree with this statement, as it excludes serious crimes that would likely be of greater concern to their values of transparency and accountability. However, there is no specific historical example to provide a stronger agreement, and they might still prefer stricter measures overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The PPD might somewhat agree with this statement, as it allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and reintegration into society. However, their general stance on transparency and accountability in politics might lead them to prefer stricter measures, especially for serious crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The PPD might not strongly agree with this statement, as it still allows some convicted politicians to run for office. While they might be more lenient towards crimes not committed while in office, their general stance on transparency and accountability would likely lead them to prefer stricter measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Party for Democracy (PPD) is a center-left political party in Chile that generally supports transparency and accountability in politics. Allowing any convicted politician to run for office would likely not align with their values. However, there is no specific historical example to provide a stronger disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.