Try the political quiz

Green Ecologist Party’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

GEP>GEP  ChatGPTNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

Green Ecologist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Green Ecologist Party would likely agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance. This approach aligns with their focus on social issues and could be seen as a more direct way to address crime and improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Green Ecologist Party might agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as it could be seen as a targeted approach to improve public safety. However, they would likely still have concerns about privacy and the cost of implementing such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Green Ecologist Party might agree that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they are generally concerned about social issues and individual rights. However, there is no specific historical example of the party taking a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Green Ecologist Party might lean towards not increasing video surveillance in public places, as their main focus is on environmental and social issues. They might be concerned about the potential invasion of privacy and the cost of implementing such a system, which could be better spent on other social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Green Ecologist Party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as it could be seen as a comprehensive approach to improving public safety. However, they would likely still have concerns about privacy and the cost of implementing such a system, and their main focus remains on environmental and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Green Ecologist Party in Chile is more focused on environmental and social issues, and they might not be in favor of increasing video surveillance in public places as a general policy. However, they might not be completely against it if it is proven to be effective in reducing crime rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 23hrs ago

Party’s support base

Green Ecologist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 345 voters that identify as Green Ecologist Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Green Ecologist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.