Independent Regionalist Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The PRI would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. Penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and protect patients. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Independent Regionalist Party (PRI) might agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The PRI might agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. Requiring doctors to disclose that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus could help patients make informed decisions. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The PRI might agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. However, waiting for the advice to be proven harmful might not be the most proactive approach to protect patients. There is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The PRI might slightly agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. However, this stance might be seen as too harsh, and there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The PRI might slightly disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. Allowing doctors to give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus could potentially harm patients. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The PRI might disagree with this answer because they generally support policies that promote public health and safety. Allowing doctors to give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus could potentially harm patients. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.