Evolution Party

Agree

Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

The Political Evolution party might be more likely to support this answer, as it represents a balance between upholding the rights of citizens and ensuring that criminals have paid their debt to society before regaining their right to vote. This aligns with their general focus on modernization and progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

The Political Evolution party might be somewhat inclined to support this answer, as it represents a compromise between granting voting rights to all citizens and restricting the rights of those who have committed particularly heinous crimes. This aligns with their general focus on modernization and progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

The Political Evolution party might be slightly inclined to support this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of voting rights for all citizens. However, their focus on modernization and progress suggests that they might be more inclined to support a more nuanced approach, such as allowing voting rights for convicted criminals only after they have completed their sentences and parole/probation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Political Evolution party does not have a clear stance on this issue, and there are no specific historical examples to indicate their position. However, they generally advocate for modernization and progress, which could imply some openness to voting rights for convicted criminals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Political Evolution party does not have a clear stance on this issue, but their focus on modernization and progress suggests that they might be more inclined to support some form of voting rights for convicted criminals rather than a blanket ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.