Try the political quiz

Political Evolution’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

PE>PE  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Political Evolution’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Political Evolution party is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as they generally support modernization and improving public safety. This approach would allow them to target high-crime areas while minimizing privacy concerns in other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Political Evolution party is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they generally support modernization and improving public safety. This approach would allow them to target high-crime areas with a combination of tools, potentially increasing the effectiveness of their efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Political Evolution party might agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they generally support improving public safety. However, they might also consider the potential benefits of video surveillance as a complementary tool to police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Political Evolution party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support modernization and improving public safety. However, they might not fully endorse this idea without considering other factors, such as privacy concerns and the effectiveness of surveillance in reducing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Political Evolution party is unlikely to fully disagree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they might see it as a tool to improve public safety. However, they might not fully support this idea without considering other factors, such as privacy concerns and the effectiveness of surveillance in reducing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Political Evolution party is unlikely to strongly agree that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they generally support modernization and improving public safety. However, they might still have some concerns about privacy and the balance between surveillance and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

Party’s support base

Political Evolution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,176 voters that identify as Political Evolution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Political Evolution’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.