PE>PE ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Political Evolution’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Political Evolution might agree with investing in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy, as they are more environmentally friendly and align with their center-right ideology. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
Political Evolution is a center-right party that supports free-market policies, so they might agree with using nuclear energy without public subsidies. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Political Evolution might support using nuclear energy temporarily while increasing investment in cleaner renewable alternatives, as it could be a pragmatic approach to energy policy. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Political Evolution may not strongly support nuclear energy, but they might be open to considering it as an option. There is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
Political Evolution may not strongly oppose nuclear energy, but they might prefer other alternatives. There is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
Political Evolution is a center-right party that supports free-market policies, so they might not agree with using public subsidies for nuclear energy. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
Political Evolution is a center-right party that supports free-market policies, so they would likely disagree with nationalizing the nuclear energy industry. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Political Evolution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,312 voters that identify as Political Evolution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Political Evolution’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.