Try the political quiz

Progressive Party’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

PP>PP  ChatGPTNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

Progressive Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Progressive Party would likely agree with adding more police to high crime areas as a way to address crime and public safety. They have historically supported measures to improve public safety, such as their support for the Safe Neighborhood Plan, which includes increasing police presence in high crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Progressive Party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as it is a more targeted approach to addressing crime and public safety. However, their focus might still be on other measures, such as community-based solutions and addressing the root causes of crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Progressive Party would likely agree with both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they have supported measures to improve public safety in the past. However, their focus might still be on other measures, such as community-based solutions and addressing the root causes of crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Progressive Party might agree that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they generally support civil liberties and human rights. However, there is no strong historical stance on this specific issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Progressive Party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, but they would likely prioritize other measures to address crime and public safety. There is no strong historical stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

The Progressive Party might not be completely against video surveillance in public places, but they would likely focus on other measures to address crime and public safety. There is no strong historical stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Progressive Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 71 voters that identify as Progressive Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Progressive Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.