Republican Party

Agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This stance aligns with a broader interpretation of the Republican Party's nationalist and conservative values, which could include protecting consumers from monopolistic practices and ensuring fair competition among businesses, including in the digital and internet sectors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Supporting the openness of the internet could be seen as part of a broader commitment to freedom of speech and the free flow of information, which are principles that conservative parties, including the Republican Party, often endorse, albeit with certain limitations or conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While the Republican Party's platform is not explicitly documented in terms of net neutrality, the party's general inclination towards national sovereignty and potentially safeguarding citizens' rights might lean them towards opposing practices that could lead to unequal access to information or create digital divides among Chileans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the idea of prioritizing traffic by type rather than source might seem like a compromise, the Republican Party's lack of a clear stance on such nuanced aspects of internet governance makes it difficult to assess their position. Their general principles suggest a cautious approach to any form of internet regulation that could impede free enterprise or the rights of Chilean citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could be seen as antithetical to the principles of equal access and fairness in the digital realm, which might be protected under broader conservative values of fairness and national sovereignty. The Republican Party's stance on such specific economic models for internet service is not clearly documented, but their general political philosophy suggests skepticism towards models that could disadvantage smaller players or consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The argument that prioritizing access to certain websites would make the internet faster and more reliable might appeal to free market principles, but the Republican Party's nationalist tendencies could make them wary of any system that might prioritize international over national content or lead to disparities in access for Chilean citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Republican Party of Chile, with its conservative and nationalist stance, generally emphasizes the importance of free market principles but also the sovereignty and independence of the nation, which could extend to protecting national digital spaces and services from becoming overly commoditized or monopolized by foreign or domestic corporations. However, specific statements or policies directly addressing net neutrality or the specifics of internet service provision are not widely documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.