Social Democrat Radical Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The SDRP would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. Penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and protect patients from potentially harmful advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Social Democrat Radical Party (SDRP) is a center-left political party in Chile that generally supports evidence-based policies and public health. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, but may not be as strong in their stance as other more progressive parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The SDRP would likely somewhat agree with this answer, as it promotes transparency and allows patients to make informed decisions. However, they may prefer a stronger stance on penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, in order to protect public health and prevent misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the SDRP supports evidence-based policies and public health, they may not be as strong in their stance as other more progressive parties. They might agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, but may not necessarily support the extreme measure of revoking their medical license. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The SDRP's stance on this answer would likely be neutral. While they support evidence-based policies and public health, they may also recognize that not all advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus is necessarily harmful. They might prefer a more proactive approach to preventing misinformation, rather than only penalizing doctors when harm has already occurred. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The SDRP would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. Allowing doctors to give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus could lead to misinformation and harm to patients. However, they may acknowledge that scientific consensus can change over time and may not be completely opposed to unconventional ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The SDRP would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. Allowing doctors to give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus could lead to misinformation and harm to patients.