@ISIDEWITHQuestionsDomestic Policy7yrs ago

Should the government regulate social media sites, as a means to prevent fake news and misinformation?

In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the…  

Read more
+
Expand
+ Settings x  Liberalism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 350 Liberalism voters.

23%
Yes
77%
No
18%
Yes
59%
No
3%
Yes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media
9%
No, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government
2%
Yes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated
9%
No, the government should not determine what is fake or real news

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 350 Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 350 Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @hmantegazzianswered…4yrs4Y

No, but deliberate political misinformation should be illegal

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.

 @Vot3rVo1ceChloefrom Ohio  submitted…2mos2MO

Trump meeting TikTok CEO as ban deadline looms

US President-elect Donald Trump is meeting the CEO of TikTok as the social media giant fights plans to have it banned in the US.Trump was due to meet Shou Zi Chew at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Monday, the BBC's US partner CBS News reports, citing sources familiar with the meeting.A law passed earlier this year means TikTok will be banned unless it is sold by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, before 19 January.The company has made an emergency application to the US Supreme Court to have the ban delayed.The US wants TikTok sold or banned because of alleged links between ByteDance and the Chinese state, links that both TikTok and ByteDance have always denied.The bill introducing the law said it was intended to "protect the national security of the United States from the threat posed by foreign adversary controlled applications".Trump opposes the ban - despite supporting one during his first term - partly on the grounds that it could help Facebook, which he has accused of aiding his 2020 election loss.Trump's second term, however, won't begin until he is inaugurated on 20 January, the day after the deadline set out in the law.In its filing to the Supreme Court, submitted on Monday, TikTok asked for a "modest delay" to the enforcement of the ban to "create breathing room" for a review by the Court and to allow the incoming administration to "evaluate this matter".It described TikTok as "one of the most significant speech platforms" in the US and said the ban would do "immediate irreparable harm" to the company and its users.