GEP>GEP ChatGPTTaip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį |
Green Ecologist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį
The Green Ecologist Party would strongly agree with this statement as they are likely to support any measure that decreases misinformation, especially in the field of health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Taip
The Green Ecologist Party in Chile is likely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus, especially in the field of health. However, there might be some room for flexibility, hence not a full score of 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.
While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, the idea of doctors losing their medical license might be seen as too harsh a punishment, hence a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.
The party would likely agree with this statement as it promotes transparency and informed decision-making. However, they might prefer stricter measures, hence a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą
While the party would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they would probably also believe in penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it hasn't been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.
The party is likely to disagree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus. They would likely disagree with the idea of patients trying unconventional ideas that contradict this consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Nr
The party is unlikely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus. They would likely disagree with the idea of not penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts this consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Green Ecologist Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.