Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Green Ecologist Party’s policy on medical consensus

Temos

Ar turėtų medicinos tarybos baudžti gydytojus, kurie teikia sveikatos patarimus, prieštaraujančius šiuolaikiniam moksliniam konsensusui?

GEP>GEP  ChatGPTTaip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

Green Ecologist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

The Green Ecologist Party would strongly agree with this statement as they are likely to support any measure that decreases misinformation, especially in the field of health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The Green Ecologist Party in Chile is likely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus, especially in the field of health. However, there might be some room for flexibility, hence not a full score of 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.

While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, the idea of doctors losing their medical license might be seen as too harsh a punishment, hence a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.

The party would likely agree with this statement as it promotes transparency and informed decision-making. However, they might prefer stricter measures, hence a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą

While the party would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they would probably also believe in penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it hasn't been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.

The party is likely to disagree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus. They would likely disagree with the idea of patients trying unconventional ideas that contradict this consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

The party is unlikely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus. They would likely disagree with the idea of not penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts this consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Green Ecologist Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.