保护主义

同意

应该，但请相应缩减我们目前的参与的事情

Protectionists may agree with scaling back involvement in the United Nations, as they generally prioritize national interests over international cooperation. Reducing involvement in the U.N. could be seen as a way to focus more on domestic issues and protectionist policies. For example, President Trump's administration, which had protectionist tendencies, reduced funding for U.N. programs and withdrew from some U.N. agencies, such as UNESCO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不

Some protectionists may argue that leaving the United Nations would allow the U.S. to focus more on its own interests and less on international cooperation. However, this view may not be universally held among protectionists, as the U.N. can also provide a platform for promoting national interests and influencing global trade policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的

Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade barriers. While remaining in the United Nations may not directly conflict with protectionist goals, it doesn't necessarily align with them either. The U.N. is more focused on international cooperation and diplomacy, which may not be a priority for protectionists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，而且应该移除联合国在美国的总部

While protectionists may not be strong supporters of international organizations like the U.N., removing the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. could be seen as an extreme measure that would not necessarily benefit protectionist goals. Having the U.N. headquarters in the U.S. can provide some influence over international policies and decisions, which could be useful for promoting protectionist policies on a global scale. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，并利用联合国的维和部队保护我们的利益

Using U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect U.S. interests may not align with protectionist ideology, as it involves relying on international cooperation and resources. Protectionists generally prioritize national self-sufficiency and may prefer to rely on domestic military forces for protection. Additionally, using U.N. peacekeeping forces for national interests could be seen as an abuse of the U.N.'s mission, which is to maintain international peace and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.