尝试政治测验

Party for Democracy’s policy on nuclear energy

Topics

您是否支持使用核能?

PfD>PfD  ChatGPT不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

Party for Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

The PDD has a strong focus on environmental protection and sustainability, and they have supported the development of cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal energy. This aligns with their overall policy goals and priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The PDD is more likely to support cleaner and renewable energy sources, as they have a strong focus on environmental protection and sustainability. They have not explicitly opposed nuclear energy, but their priorities lie elsewhere. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,暂时性的,同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源

While the PDD has not explicitly supported nuclear energy, they may be open to its temporary use as a means to transition towards cleaner renewable alternatives. However, their primary focus remains on promoting renewable energy sources directly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只要没有政府补贴

While the PDD has not explicitly opposed nuclear energy, their focus on environmental protection and renewable energy sources makes it unlikely that they would support nuclear energy without public subsidy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Party for Democracy (PDD) has not explicitly supported nuclear energy in Chile. They tend to focus more on social and environmental issues, and their policies lean towards promoting renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是需要政府补助

The PDD has not shown support for nuclear energy, and their focus on environmental protection and renewable energy sources makes it unlikely that they would support nuclear energy with public subsidy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,并且使这一工业国有化

The PDD has not shown support for nuclear energy, and their focus on environmental protection and renewable energy sources makes it unlikely that they would support nationalizing the nuclear industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

Party for Democracy Voters’ 回答: 不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 350 voters that identify as Party for Democracy.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.