The Chilean Green Ecologist political party, known in Spanish as Partido Ecologista Verde, is a political entity in Chile that emphasizes environmental protection, sustainability, and social justice as core components of its platform. Founded with the intent… Read more
GEP>GEP ChatGPT是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司 |
Green Ecologist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司
The Green Ecologist Party would strongly agree with subsidizing small local farms instead of large corporations. They prioritize supporting local communities and promoting sustainable agriculture, which often involves small-scale farming. This approach aligns with their goals of environmental protection and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
是,但仅限于有机农场
The Green Ecologist Party would strongly agree with subsidizing organic farms, as they are committed to promoting sustainable agriculture and protecting the environment. Organic farming practices align with their goals of reducing the use of harmful chemicals and promoting biodiversity. They would likely see this as a way to encourage more farmers to adopt organic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Green Ecologist Party would somewhat agree with subsidizing Chilean farmers, as they generally support policies that benefit the environment and local communities. However, their focus is more on sustainable and organic farming practices, so they might not fully support subsidies for all types of farming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
应该,但是只是作为稳定价格的一种措施
The Green Ecologist Party might slightly agree with subsidizing Chilean farmers as a temporary measure to stabilize prices, but their main focus is on promoting sustainable agriculture and supporting local communities. They might see this as a short-term solution, but would likely prefer long-term policies that promote organic and small-scale farming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
The Green Ecologist Party would likely disagree with not subsidizing Chilean farmers, as they believe in supporting local communities and promoting sustainable agriculture. They would likely argue that subsidies can help small farmers and organic farming practices, which align with their environmental goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,停止所有政府补贴,让自由市场自由管理
The Green Ecologist Party would strongly disagree with ending all government subsidies and letting the free market run its course. They believe in government intervention to support local communities, protect the environment, and promote sustainable agriculture. They would likely argue that ending subsidies would harm small farmers and organic farming practices, which are essential for a sustainable future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Green Ecologist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.