Green Ecologist Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This answer aligns closely with the Green Ecologist Party's values of promoting peace, human rights, and environmental sustainability. The party would strongly agree with banning all sales to countries with human rights violations, as it represents a firm stance against supporting regimes that violate human rights, which is consistent with their advocacy for global justice and peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Green Ecologist Party would likely support measures that promote peace and reduce arms proliferation, their primary focus on environmental issues and human rights means they might slightly prefer options that directly address human rights violations. However, they would still view a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries as a positive step towards reducing global conflict and promoting sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Green Ecologist Party, with its focus on environmental sustainability and human rights, would likely agree with imposing restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations. This stance aligns with their broader commitment to peace and human rights. However, the score is not higher because the party might prefer more stringent measures, such as a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不

Given the Green Ecologist Party's emphasis on human rights and environmental protection, it is highly unlikely they would support the absence of restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This position would be in direct conflict with their core principles and advocacy for global peace and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Green Ecologist Party would strongly disagree with this stance, as it could potentially support the arming of countries that commit human rights violations under the guise of defending allies. This position is antithetical to the party's principles of peace, human rights, and environmental protection, and would likely be seen as exacerbating global conflicts and undermining efforts to promote sustainable and peaceful international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.