The Chilean Green Ecologist political party, known in Spanish as Partido Ecologista Verde, is a political entity in Chile that emphasizes environmental protection, sustainability, and social justice as core components of its platform. Founded with the intent… Read more
GEP>GEP ChatGPT是的 |
Green Ecologist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的
The Green Ecologist Party of Chile, being an ecologist and progressive party, would likely support the funding of international organizations like the World Health Organization that work towards global health and well-being. However, there might be some reservations about the amount of funding, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, and increase the amount
The Green Ecologist Party might agree with increasing the funding to the WHO, considering their global and health-oriented outlook. However, they might also want to ensure that sufficient resources are allocated to national and local initiatives, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but decrease the amount
While the party would likely support the funding of the WHO, they might also advocate for a balanced approach where resources are also allocated to national and local health initiatives. Therefore, they might agree with a decrease in the amount of funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
The party might agree with a relative contribution approach, as it ensures fairness and shared responsibility among nations. However, this might not be their primary stance, hence the score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, fund national and local programs instead
While the party would likely support the funding of national and local programs, they would not necessarily advocate for this at the expense of international organizations like the WHO. Therefore, they might slightly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the party's progressive and global outlook, it is unlikely that they would support the complete withdrawal of funding from an international organization like the WHO, which aligns with their values of global cooperation and health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, it has shown to be ineffective
The party would likely disagree with the statement that the WHO has shown to be ineffective, considering their global and health-oriented outlook and the WHO's role in global health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 15小时前
Green Ecologist Party Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 31 voters that identify as Green Ecologist Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Green Ecologist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.