尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Political Evolution’s policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

PE>PE  ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

Political Evolution’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

Political Evolution would strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for the cost of living, as they aim to improve social welfare and promote economic development. This proposal aligns with their goals of ensuring a decent quality of life for all citizens and reducing inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

Political Evolution would likely agree with increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners, as they aim to improve social welfare and reduce inequality. This proposal aligns with their goals of promoting economic development and improving the quality of life for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

Political Evolution might agree with increasing pension payments for government workers but not for politicians, as they aim to modernize the political system and reduce corruption. This proposal could be seen as a way to promote transparency and fairness in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Political Evolution might somewhat agree with increasing pension payments for retired government workers, but they would likely prioritize other social and economic reforms first. Their focus is on modernizing the political system and promoting social and economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

Political Evolution might somewhat agree with this statement, as they are concerned with fiscal responsibility and economic development. However, they would likely prioritize social welfare and other reforms over reducing national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Political Evolution would likely disagree with not increasing pension payments, as they aim to improve social welfare and promote economic development. However, they might not prioritize this issue over other reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

Political Evolution would likely disagree with reducing pension payments for retired government workers, as they aim to improve social welfare and promote economic development. Reducing pension payments would go against their goals of improving the quality of life for citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Political Evolution 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 61 voters that identify as Political Evolution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Political Evolution’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.