尝试政治测验

Political Evolution’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

PE>PE  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Political Evolution’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

The Political Evolution party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their values of individual choice and freedom. They would support the idea of voluntary service, allowing citizens to decide whether or not they want to participate in military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

As a liberal party, the Political Evolution would likely lean towards not requiring military service for all 18-year-olds. They would prefer to focus on individual choice and opportunities for education and employment, rather than mandatory service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Political Evolution party might be more open to this idea, as it focuses on education and skill development, which aligns with their values. However, they would still prefer a voluntary service system that allows citizens to choose whether or not to participate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the Political Evolution party may not be completely opposed to this idea, it still involves mandatory service for some citizens, which goes against their principles of individual choice. They might see this as a compromise, but it would not be their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

While the Political Evolution party might see some merit in targeting those with criminal records for mandatory service, it still goes against their principles of individual choice and freedom. They would likely prefer a voluntary service system that offers opportunities for rehabilitation and skill development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Political Evolution party in Chile is a center-right liberal party that generally supports individual freedoms and limited government intervention. They would likely not strongly support mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds, as it goes against their principles of individual choice and freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Political Evolution party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it not only involves mandatory service but also extends the length of service. This goes against their values of individual choice and freedom, and they would prefer a voluntary service system instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1天前

Party’s support base

Political Evolution 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,482 voters that identify as Political Evolution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Political Evolution’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.