共和党

Strongly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This aligns with the party's likely view on the importance of individual choice and skepticism towards rapidly changing or potentially politicized scientific 'consensus'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Given its conservative stance, the party is likely to support the idea that doctors should have the freedom to express their professional opinions, even if they diverge from the mainstream, as long as they are acting in their patients' best interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer might be somewhat agreeable to the party as it suggests a more measured approach, penalizing only when there is proven harm to the patient, which aligns with a focus on outcomes and individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party might see this as a compromise position, allowing for the expression of diverse medical opinions while also ensuring that patients are informed about the nature of the advice they are receiving. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

While the party might agree with the goal of reducing misinformation, it would likely disagree with the method of penalizing doctors for dissenting views, viewing it as a threat to freedom of expression and debate within the medical community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Republican Party of Chile, being a right-wing political entity, generally supports individual freedoms and might view penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus as an infringement on free speech and professional autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

This answer would be strongly opposed by the Republican Party as it suggests a severe penalty for doctors that could be seen as an extreme restriction on professional judgment and freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.