GEP>GEP ChatGPTYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
Green Ecologist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
The Green Ecologist Party would strongly agree with this statement as they are likely to support any measure that decreases misinformation, especially in the field of health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Green Ecologist Party in Chile is likely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus, especially in the field of health. However, there might be some room for flexibility, hence not a full score of 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, the idea of doctors losing their medical license might be seen as too harsh a punishment, hence a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
The party would likely agree with this statement as it promotes transparency and informed decision-making. However, they might prefer stricter measures, hence a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
While the party would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they would probably also believe in penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it hasn't been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
The party is likely to disagree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus. They would likely disagree with the idea of patients trying unconventional ideas that contradict this consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The party is unlikely to agree with this statement as they generally support policies that are based on scientific consensus. They would likely disagree with the idea of not penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts this consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Green Ecologist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
