Try the political quiz

Political Evolution’s policy on elected representatives

Topics

Should the number of elected representatives be reduced?

PE>PE  ChatGPTNo, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits

Political Evolution’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits

The Chilean Political Evolution party would likely agree with this answer, as they support fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Reducing salaries and retirement benefits for elected representatives could be seen as a way to achieve these goals without necessarily reducing the number of representatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and reduce their salaries and retirement benefits

The Chilean Political Evolution party is more likely to agree with this answer, as they support both reducing bureaucracy and promoting fiscal responsibility. Reducing salaries and retirement benefits for elected representatives could be seen as a way to achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Chilean Political Evolution party might somewhat agree with reducing the number of elected representatives, as they generally support more efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. However, there is no strong evidence that this is a major focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but increase their salaries to attract the best politicians

The party's stance on this issue is unclear, as they support both reducing bureaucracy and promoting fiscal responsibility. While increasing salaries to attract better politicians might be seen as a way to achieve these goals, it could also be seen as contradictory to their focus on reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the party might somewhat agree with reducing the number of elected representatives for efficiency purposes, so they would likely disagree with not reducing the number of representatives. However, this issue is not a major focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would give too much political power to a small number of representatives

The party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support more efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. They might not see reducing the number of elected representatives as giving too much power to a small number of representatives, but rather as a way to streamline decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Political Evolution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,474 voters that identify as Political Evolution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Political Evolution’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.