Patagonian Regional Democracy Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it promotes transparency and informed decision-making. They would likely believe that patients have a right to know when a doctor's advice contradicts scientific consensus, so they can make informed decisions about their care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general stance on promoting public health and safety. They would likely believe that reducing misinformation is crucial for ensuring that patients receive the best possible care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Patagonian Regional Democracy party, while not explicitly stating a position on this issue, generally supports policies that promote public health and safety. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as this could potentially harm patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the party would likely agree with the sentiment behind this statement, they may not fully agree with the idea of only penalizing doctors when their advice has been proven to harm a patient. They would likely believe that doctors should be held to a high standard of care and accuracy in all situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they may not necessarily support such a severe penalty as losing their medical license. This would depend on the specific circumstances and severity of the misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

While the party recognizes the importance of innovation and progress, they would likely disagree with this statement due to the potential risks to patient safety. They would likely believe that any unconventional ideas should be thoroughly tested and proven safe before being recommended to patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given their general stance on public health and safety, the party would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate and scientifically sound advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.