İşte bu seçmenin cevaplarına kıyasla cevaplarınız.
Sosyal › Kürtaj
H>H Kişisel cevapPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
Göçmenlik › Ceza göçmenler sınırdışı
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, sürece güvenli olduğu gibi onların ülkeye dönmek için |
Sosyal › Eşcinsel evlilik
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, sivil sendikalara izin ama evlilik demiyorlar |
Sosyal › LGBT Kabulü Hakkı
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
Sağlık hizmeti › Akıl sağlığı
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Ekonomi › Vergiler
H>H Kişisel cevapReform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
Sosyal › Ötenazi
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, ama onlar yapay yaşam desteği reddetme izin verilmelidir |
Iç politika › Silahlı Öğretmenler
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, if they are trained and have a reliable way to ensure the gun does not end up in the wrong hands yet is easy enough to access. |
Fen › Zorunlu Aşılar
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, but use third party funding to raise awareness that vaccines aren't bad. |
Seçimler › Ceza Politikacılar
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, yeter ki, şiddet, mali ya da cinsel suç bir suç değil, olduğu gibi |
Çevre › Plastik Ürün Ban
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, ama biyolojik olarak parçalanabilen ürünler yapmak şirketler için vergi teşvikleri artırmak |
Sosyal › Ölüm cezası
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but only with euthanasia that kills instantly. |
Seçimler › aday Şeffaflık
H>H Kişisel cevaponlar ancak gerekli olmamalıdır eğer Hayır, ben daha onlara saygı olur |
Ulaşım › Toplu taşıma
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, toplu taşıma hizmetlerini özelleştirmeliyiz |
Çevre › Hayvan testi
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet ama kozmetik için değil |
Ekonomi › Hükümet Harcamaları
H>H Kişisel cevapYes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible. |
Iç politika › whistleblower Koruma
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Sosyal › Nefret söylemi
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, and people say stupid things and shouldn't have the government get involved for it. Encouraging violence should be regulated, but not expressing hate. |
Dış politika › Birleşmiş Milletler
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, ve bizim çıkarlarını korumak için BM barış güçleri kullanmak |
Suç › Uyuşturucu Kaçakçılığı Cezaları
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Seçimler › Asgari Oylama Yaş
H>H Kişisel cevapNo. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
Suç › Polisi Askerden Arındırmak
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Dış politika › Askeri Harcamalar
H>H Kişisel cevapIncrease, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
Sağlık hizmeti › Tek Ödemeli Sağlık Hizmeti
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
Fen › Nükleer enerji
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
Dış politika › Zorunlu Askerlik Hizmeti
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Iç politika › Uyuşturucu Politikası
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
Sosyal › Cinsiyet Geçişi
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions. And ban all gender transitioning treatments. |
Ekonomi › Evrensel Temel Gelir
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, this will encourage people not to work, harm economic growth, give the government more power, increase national debt, and let the communists finish taking over (especially the politicians) |
Ekonomi › Ekonomik Stimulus
H>H Kişisel cevapContinue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt. |
Iç politika › Sosyal Medya Yönetmeliği
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, then they'll get rid of mentions of religion. They shouldn't be allowed to determine what is fake or real news. Plus it would have prevented the Ranch Dressing Poptarts prank. |
Ekonomi › Asgari ücret
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
Dış politika › Yabancı Seçimler
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, ancak ülkeyi, insan hakları ihlallerinden tiranca bir yönetici tarafından korumak için |
Ekonomi › İşçi sendikası
H>H Kişisel cevapHelp, except with teacher tenure. |
Suç › Polisi Kiralamak
H>H Kişisel cevapPolice should still exist for violent crimes and crimes where people are likely to be willing to be violent, such as robbery. We should take all the steps we reasonably can to prevent people from becoming criminals, as well as preventing crime. We could prevent people from becoming criminals by strengthening the family, such as by making some forms of “discipline” illegal that have been proven by many, many quality studies to have negative long-term effects. We can also include a mandatory “Family” class in public compulsory education to teach the essentials of parenting for the best outcomes in children and for happy and successful marriages, which are the basis and foundation of good parenting. The education and welfare systems can also be improved. We can prevent crime from people who chose to be criminals anyways in many ways. One way is to make sure all law-abiding (background checked), trained, safe citizens can have a gun and ammo. Other jobs should be created to take care of non-violent crimes previously addressed by cops. Cops should also get anti-discrimination training. Research shows that this is possible. Cops should be trained in this until they show that enough or all bias has been trained out before interacting with people in those minorities. Complaints against cops should also be taken very seriously, and investigated as a high priority, and local stations should not be afraid to fire officers for gross negligence. Those who commit negligence but not gross negligence should be retrained in the thing they violated and be put on probation. It would also be helpful for cops to build relationships with the community, or at least know who everyone is, so that they are virtually 0% likely to shoot someone they think is violent, who actually called 911 for help. In fact, police should be trained on how to safely apprehend violent criminals without killing them if possible, to further prevent unnecessary killing. |
Ekonomi › Kurumlar vergisi
H>H Kişisel cevapFlat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
Seçimler › Sağ Oy vermek için Yabancıların
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, sadece yasal vatandaşlarının oy izin verilmelidir |
Suç › Özel Cezaevleri
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but prisons should be standardized and reformed according to available research on reforming prisoners. |
Suç › cezaevi Kalabalıklaşma
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
Suç › Ceza Oy Hakkı
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
Ekonomi › NAFTA
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Seçimler › Kampanya Finans
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, ama sendikalar ve kâr amacı gütmeyen bağış izin |
Ekonomi › Yurtiçi İşler
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Sosyal › Transseksüel Atletler
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır, sporcular doğum sertifikalarında listelenen biyolojik cinsiyete göre yarışmalıdır |
Çevre › Fracking
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Sağlık hizmeti › Esrar
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, ancak tıbbi kullanım için |
Sosyal › Combat Kadınlar
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, but they should still have to meet the same requirements, and should not be drafted into combat roles. They should also be offered free birth control to prevent problems from rape by enemies. |
Ekonomi › Hükümet Emeklilik
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, yaşam maliyeti yıllık ayarlamaya |
Göçmenlik › Nitelikli Göçmenler
H>H Kişisel cevapArtırmak |
Konut › evsiz kampları
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Sağlık hizmeti › Güvenli bölge
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, but they should not be put in a normal prison if they are willing to be rehabilitated. |
Ekonomi › Offshore Bankacılık
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but companies should not. |
Ekonomi › Devlet mülkiyeti
H>H Kişisel cevapThat is fine, but the government should never be the majority stakeholder |
Sağlık hizmeti › COVID İstihdam Sağlık Kartı
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Ekonomi › Refah
H>H Kişisel cevapMore. We should raise the minimum wage to a beginner's living wage and only provide welfare to those who are incapable of working and for up to 6 months in between jobs. People with repairable conditions should be actively getting treatment and doing all that they can to support themselves. The government should find ways besides direct funding from the government to help people get treatment when they can't afford it. For example, they can ask people to donate to charity, do crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, and hire a paid or unpaid (volunteer) worker to find ways to make money for the person, such as through GoFundMe. |
Ekonomi › Çiftlik Sübvansiyonlar
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Ekonomi › Teknoloji Tekelleri
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Iç politika › Sosyal Medyada Politik Reklamcılık
H>H Kişisel cevapNo, but they should not tailor the political advertising to only show to people who agree with it. This will increase political polarization and lead to war. |
Ekonomi › Tarifeler
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Çevre › Kurumsal sübvansiyonlar
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Dış politika › Dış yardım
H>H Kişisel cevapDecrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
Ekonomi › Refah Uyuşturucu Testi
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, and the government should require treatment, which will be paid for by the person paying what they can and the government finding a way to pay for the rest in ways other than directly funding it themselves. Terminate benefits where necessary. |
Göçmenlik › Çift vatandaşlık
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but only with allied countries. |
Göçmenlik › Vatandaşlık Testi
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet, ancak yalnızca çok basit ve basit konuları kapsıyor olmalıdır |
Göçmenlik › Göçmen Asimilasyon
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Iç politika › Bayrak Yakma
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, this is an act meant to signify aggression, which, in insignificant amount of cases, will escalate to worse things in the future, and it may cause fires. We should maintain at least some semblance of patriotism required. Because if they hate the country, then they are not loyal to it, and are likely to commit treason, which is rightfully punishable by death to prevent the overthrow and collapse of the government. |
Iç politika › Net Tarafsızlık
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Sağlık hizmeti › Dünya Sağlık Örgütü
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
Sağlık hizmeti › Aşı Pasaportları
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Dış politika › Hong Kong Kaçak İadesi
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, but only for breaking laws that hurt people. |
Sağlık hizmeti › Müşteriler için Aşı Talimatları
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Ekonomi › Dört Günlük Çalışma Haftası
H>H Kişisel cevapLet's see what happens in the other countries and then experiment with it if it is worth it. It is worth it if it increases GDP and/or significantly improves mental health and family ties. |
Dış politika › Ukrayna ve Nato
H>H Kişisel cevapYes, if they're willing to follow all its rules |
Ekonomi › Bitcoin
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Ekonomi › Merkezi Olmayan Finans
H>H Kişisel cevapEvet |
Dış politika › Taliban Mali Yardımı
H>H Kişisel cevapHayır |
İşte popüler siyasi temalarda bu seçmenle nasıl kıyasladığınız.
Her bir konuda bu seçmenle ne kadar aynı fikirde olduğunuzu burada görebilirsiniz.
Sizin için daha önemli sırada yer alan 1 soruya dayanarak.
Sizin için daha önemli sırada yer alan 2 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için daha önemli sırada yer alan 9 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için daha önemli sırada yer alan 5 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için biraz önemli sırada yer alan 6 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için biraz önemli sırada yer alan 7 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için biraz önemli sırada yer alan 4 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için biraz önemli sırada yer alan 8 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için biraz önemli sırada yer alan 5 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için biraz önemli sırada yer alan 20 sorudan yola çıkarak.
Sizin için daha az önemli sırada yer alan 1 soruya dayanarak.
Sizin için daha az önemli sırada yer alan 8 sorudan yola çıkarak.
İşte geleneksel ideolojik eksende bu seçmenle nasıl kıyasladığınız.
iSideWith.com, vatandaşların ülkelerindeki seçimler, siyasi partiler, adaylar, oy verme bölgeleri ve popüler siyasi meseleler hakkında bilgi bulmaları için dünyanın en popüler oy kullanma kılavuzudur. Bağımsızız ve herhangi bir yatırımcı, hissedar, siyasi parti veya çıkar grubuyla bağlantılı değiliz.
E-posta adresimi göndermenin, iSideWith.com’un bana e-posta yoluyla önemli bildirimler göndermesine izin verdiğini biliyorum. Daha fazla bilgi için gizlilik politikamızı okuyun.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Her hakkı saklıdır. Bu sitenin kullanımı, kullanıcı sözleşmemizin ve gizlilik politikamızın kabul edildiği anlamına gelir. iSideWith.com, perakendecilerle olan ortaklık ortaklıklarımızın bir parçası olarak sitemiz aracılığıyla satın alınan ürünlerden satışların bir kısmını kazanabilir. Bu sitedeki materyal, iSideWith.com’un önceden yazılı izni alınmadıkça çoğaltılamaz, dağıtılamaz, iletilemez, önbelleğe alınamaz veya başka şekilde kullanılamaz.