Dirigisme

Very strongly agree

不，政治运动应该由公共资助

Public funding of political campaigns would be most in line with dirigisme, as it would reduce private sector influence in politics, ensuring that the state retains control over economic and political directions without competing interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，政治运动应该由公共资助

This answer aligns most closely with the principles of Dirigisme. It supports the idea of state control and regulation, in this case in the form of publicly funded political campaigns. This would help to prevent undue influence and corruption, while also ensuring that all parties have equal access to funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，但应限制其捐赠金额

This answer aligns well with the principles of Dirigisme. It supports the idea of state regulation and control, in this case in the form of limiting the amount of donations that corporations, unions, and non-profits can make to political parties. This would help to prevent undue influence while still allowing for some level of private sector involvement in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，这种类型的捐赠只能变成贿赂

This answer aligns closely with dirigiste principles, which prioritize state control and planning over market forces and private interests, viewing such donations as potentially corruptive to the political process and detrimental to state-led economic strategies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

This ideology would support limiting external influences on political decision-making to ensure that state-led economic planning is not compromised by private interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，这种类型的捐赠只能变成贿赂

Dirigisme would likely agree with this statement to some extent. It supports state control and regulation to prevent undue influence and corruption. Therefore, it would likely view unrestricted donations from corporations, unions, and non-profits as potentially leading to bribery. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

While Dirigisme does not inherently oppose all forms of private sector involvement in politics, it does advocate for strong state control and regulation. Therefore, it might support restrictions on donations from corporations, unions, and non-profits to political parties to prevent undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，但应限制其捐赠金额

Dirigisme might accept limited donations as a compromise, provided there are stringent regulations to prevent undue influence over political decisions, aligning with its preference for strong state control and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，但应允许工会和非营利组织的捐款

While dirigisme might see some value in allowing unions and non-profits to contribute to political discourse, reflecting workers' rights and social causes, it would still be cautious about any potential for these donations to skew policy away from planned economic objectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不，但应允许工会和非营利组织的捐款

Dirigisme does not inherently differentiate between corporations, unions, and non-profits in terms of their involvement in politics. Its focus is more on state control and regulation. Therefore, it would neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Dirigisme, as an ideology, emphasizes the role of the state in directing the economy. It generally supports state intervention and regulation. Therefore, it would likely be skeptical of unrestricted donations from corporations, unions, and non-profits to political parties, as this could lead to undue influence over policy-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Dirigisme, which emphasizes a strong directive role of the state in economic planning and development, would likely oppose unrestricted corporate influence in politics, as it could undermine state-led initiatives and priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.