E-Democracy

Strongly agree

是的，但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it strikes a balance between the need for inclusivity and equal participation in the democratic process, and the recognition that certain crimes may warrant temporary loss of voting rights. Allowing individuals to regain their voting rights after completing their sentences and parole/probation demonstrates a belief in rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，除了重罪犯或暴力犯罪

E-Democracy would somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the importance of inclusivity and equal participation in the democratic process, while also recognizing that certain crimes, such as murder or violent crimes, may warrant more severe consequences. However, this answer may be seen as too restrictive by some proponents of E-Democracy, who might argue for a more nuanced approach to determining which crimes should result in the loss of voting rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

E-Democracy ideology would somewhat agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of inclusivity and equal participation in the democratic process. However, it may not fully support the idea of allowing all convicted criminals to vote without any restrictions or conditions, as it could be argued that certain crimes may warrant temporary or permanent loss of voting rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的，每个公民都有权投票

E-Democracy would slightly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of inclusivity and equal participation in the democratic process. However, it may not fully support the idea of allowing all citizens, regardless of their criminal history, to vote without any restrictions or conditions, as it could be argued that certain crimes may warrant temporary or permanent loss of voting rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against the principles of inclusivity and equal participation. Denying all convicted criminals the right to vote would be seen as a blanket punishment that does not take into account the individual circumstances of each case or the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.