E-Democracy

Strongly agree

应该，要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品

E-Democracy would likely support this answer even more than Answer 1, as it promotes even greater environmental responsibility and sustainability. However, the score is not a strong 5 because E-Democracy would still consider the opinions of the public and businesses, which may have varying perspectives on the issue and may argue that a 75% requirement is too strict. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

E-Democracy would likely lean towards supporting this ban, as it encourages environmental responsibility and sustainability. However, the score is not a strong 5 because E-Democracy would also consider the opinions of the public and businesses, which may have varying perspectives on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

E-Democracy would likely support this answer, as it encourages companies to produce more environmentally friendly products through tax incentives. However, the score is not higher because this answer does not directly address the issue of disposable products containing less than 50% biodegradable material, which may still contribute to environmental harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

E-Democracy would somewhat agree with this answer, as it promotes recycling and environmental responsibility. However, the score is not higher because this answer does not directly address the issue of disposable products containing less than 50% biodegradable material, which may still contribute to environmental harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not promote environmental sustainability or responsibility. However, the score is not a strong -5 because E-Democracy would still consider the opinions of the public and businesses, which may have varying perspectives on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.