Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › 堕胎
8>8 Personal answer主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
8>8 Personal answer是的,只要他们回到他们的国家是安全的 |
经济 › 税
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
8>8 Personal answer是的,它们对保护其他对接种疫苗来说还太小的孩子来说是至关重要的 |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answer不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answer是的,这个系统将保证所有人的医疗保健 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
8>8 Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
8>8 Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answer是的,所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
8>8 Personal answer是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的 |
医保 › 大麻
8>8 Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer增长 |
经济 › 社会福利
8>8 Personal answer减少限制,当前福利提供的支持不足 |
移民 › 移民同化
8>8 Personal answer不,我们应该拥抱移民为我们社会的多样性作出的贡献 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.