Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
T>T Personal answer不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
T>T Personal answer不是,除非他们合法地进入此国家 |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
T>T Personal answer不要让政府参与到婚姻里面,而是要将它当做一个宗教的决定 |
社会 › 安乐死
T>T Personal answer不,但应该允许这些患者拒绝接受人工急救 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
T>T Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
经济 › 税
T>T Personal answer降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
T>T Personal answer是的,学校应至少要求一名教师或保安人员配备武器 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
T>T Personal answer不,但要求要上公立学校的学生做疫苗接种 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
T>T Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
T>T Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 举报人保护
T>T Personal answer是,但前提是发布这些信息不会威胁到我们国家安全 |
环境 › Animal Testing
T>T Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
T>T Personal answer是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
外交政策 › 联合国
T>T Personal answerNo, but we should continue to associate with nation's that share our values and ideals |
社会 › Hate Speech
T>T Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
T>T Personal answer应该,但前提必须是有证据证明有人死于他们贩运的毒品。 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
T>T Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
T>T Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
T>T Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
经济 › 经济刺激
T>T Personal answer是的,但是使用对所有公民减税的形式。 |
经济 › 最低工资
T>T Personal answer不应该,大多数最低工资的工作其意义是让人获取经验而不是养家糊口 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
T>T Personal answer不,这将鼓励人们不工作,并对经济增长带来伤害 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
T>T Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
外交政策 › 外国选举
T>T Personal answer应该,但仅限于影响舆情,不能干预公平的投票过程。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
T>T Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
T>T Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
T>T Personal answer不,成员国之间的贸易已经非常不均衡了 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
T>T Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
T>T Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
T>T Personal answer不 |
经济 › 国内工作
T>T Personal answer是的,并大幅增加外包业务的税费和进口关税 |
医保 › 大麻
T>T Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
经济 › 政府养老金
T>T Personal answer应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客 |
移民 › 技术移民
T>T Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
经济 › State Ownership
T>T Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled |
医保 › 安全港
T>T Personal answer不应该,但应该合法化毒品 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
T>T Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
经济 › 社会福利
T>T Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
T>T Personal answer不 |
经济 › 农场补贴
T>T Personal answer不,停止所有政府补贴,让自由市场自由管理 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
T>T Personal answer不 |
经济 › 关税
T>T Personal answer是的,我们的国家长期以来一直处于贸易交易中失败的一方 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
T>T Personal answer对藏匿或宣扬恐怖主义的国家减少并拒绝提供援助 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
T>T Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
T>T Personal answer应该,要对从政府那收到钱的所有人进行检查,包括雇员和政治家 |
移民 › 双重国籍
T>T Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
移民 › 公民考试
T>T Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 移民同化
T>T Personal answer是的,需要停止提供政府文件和服务的多语种翻译 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
T>T Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
医保 › World Health Organization
T>T Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
T>T Personal answer是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.