Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
8>8 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerNo. El gobierno tiene lagunas de inversión, en las que los fondos son mal utilizados, por lo que se requieren mejoras de gestión y control financiero, junto con una constante revisión de las políticas públicas. También, debería reducirse el gasto militar. Finalmente, los recortes afectan negativamente a la economía. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
8>8 Personal answer减少 |
总统大选 › Elected Representatives
8>8 Personal answerNo. Al contrario, debería aumentar. Asimismo, debería suprimirse la bicameralidad del congreso. |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
8>8 Personal answerDebe analizarse droga a droga, dependiendo de los efectos adversos de cada una. Asimismo, debe haber un correlato de educación social sobre su consumo, y mayor regulación en la información de las propiedades del producto. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer增长 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
外交政策 › 外国援助
8>8 Personal answerAumentar, en la medida que permita la generación de una unidad regional latinoamericana |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.