Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answer减少 |
总统大选 › Elected Representatives
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
9>9 Personal answerantes de poder pensar en despenalizar el consumo de drogas se deben hacer cambios de base, sobretodo en temas relacionados a salud, ya que si vemos esta estrategia en otros países, el sistema de salud se encarga de administrar las drogas a quiénes las consuman, en las cantidades justas y necesarias, con el fin de controlar y acabar con los problemas de adición. una vez que se logren cambiar las bases, se podrá implementar una despenalización al consumo de drogas |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer减少,公司正在利用这个计划来降低工资 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
外交政策 › 外国援助
9>9 Personal answerdependiendo del gasto, se puede aumentar o dismuniur siempre y cuando no afecte o no reduzca la capacidad financiera de ayudar en primer lugar a los chilenos que más lo necesiten |
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answerNo, pero deberían implementarse más herramientas para que pueden aprenderlo y de esta forma poder desenvolverse mejor en el país |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer应该,而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.