Hier zijn uw antwoorden vergeleken met de antwoorden van deze kiezer.
Sociaal › Abortus
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
Sociaal › Homohuwelijk
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, geregistreerde partnerschappen toestaan, maar noem het geen huwelijk |
Immigratie › Criminele Immigranten Deporteren
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, zolang het voor hen veilig is om terug te keren naar hun land |
Sociaal › Lgbt-adoptierechten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
Gezondheidszorg › Geestelijke gezondheid
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
de Economie › Belastingen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordReform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
Sociaal › Euthanasie
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, maar zij moeten wel kunstmatige ondersteuning van hun leven kunnen weigeren. |
Binnenlands Beleid › Bewapende leerkrachten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, if they are trained and have a reliable way to ensure the gun does not end up in the wrong hands yet is easy enough to access. |
Wetenschap › Verplichte Vaccinaties
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, but use third party funding to raise awareness that vaccines aren't bad. |
Verkiezingen › Criminele Politici
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, als het maar geen misdrijf, geweldsmisdrijf, financieel misdrijf of seksueel misdrijf was |
Het milieu › Verbod Plastic Producten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, maar fiscale stimulansen moeten verhoogd worden voor bedrijven die biologisch afbreekbare producten maken |
Sociaal › Doodstraf
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but only with euthanasia that kills instantly. |
Verkiezingen › Kandidaat-transparantie
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, ik zou ze wel meer waarderen als ze dat doen, maar ze zouden daartoe niet verplicht moeten worden |
Vervoer › Openbaar vervoer
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, en we zouden meer openbare vervoersdiensten moeten privatiseren |
Het milieu › Dier proeven
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, maar niet voor cosmetica |
de Economie › Overheidsuitgaven
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible. |
Binnenlands Beleid › Bescherming voor klokkenluiders
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Sociaal › Haattoespraak
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, and people say stupid things and shouldn't have the government get involved for it. Encouraging violence should be regulated, but not expressing hate. |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Verenigde Naties
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, en gebruik de U.N. vredesmachten om onze belangen te beschermen. |
Criminaliteit › Straffen voor drugssmokkelaars
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Verkiezingen › Minimum leeftijd waarop gestemd mag worden
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
Criminaliteit › Demilitariseer de politie
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Militaire uitgaves
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordIncrease, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
Gezondheidszorg › Gezondheidszorg met één betaler
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
Wetenschap › Kernenergie
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Verplichte militaire dienst
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Binnenlands Beleid › Drugsbeleid
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
Sociaal › Genderovergang
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions. And ban all gender transitioning treatments. |
de Economie › Economische Stimuli
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordContinue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt. |
de Economie › Universeel basisinkomen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, this will encourage people not to work, harm economic growth, give the government more power, increase national debt, and let the communists finish taking over (especially the politicians) |
Binnenlands Beleid › Regulatie van social media
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, then they'll get rid of mentions of religion. They shouldn't be allowed to determine what is fake or real news. Plus it would have prevented the Ranch Dressing Poptarts prank. |
de Economie › Minimumloon
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Buitenlandse verkiezingen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, maar alleen om het land te beschermen tegen mensenrechtenschendingen door een tirannieke heerser |
de Economie › Vakbonden
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordHelp, except with teacher tenure. |
Criminaliteit › Ontfinanciering van de politie
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordPolice should still exist for violent crimes and crimes where people are likely to be willing to be violent, such as robbery. We should take all the steps we reasonably can to prevent people from becoming criminals, as well as preventing crime. We could prevent people from becoming criminals by strengthening the family, such as by making some forms of “discipline” illegal that have been proven by many, many quality studies to have negative long-term effects. We can also include a mandatory “Family” class in public compulsory education to teach the essentials of parenting for the best outcomes in children and for happy and successful marriages, which are the basis and foundation of good parenting. The education and welfare systems can also be improved. We can prevent crime from people who chose to be criminals anyways in many ways. One way is to make sure all law-abiding (background checked), trained, safe citizens can have a gun and ammo. Other jobs should be created to take care of non-violent crimes previously addressed by cops. Cops should also get anti-discrimination training. Research shows that this is possible. Cops should be trained in this until they show that enough or all bias has been trained out before interacting with people in those minorities. Complaints against cops should also be taken very seriously, and investigated as a high priority, and local stations should not be afraid to fire officers for gross negligence. Those who commit negligence but not gross negligence should be retrained in the thing they violated and be put on probation. It would also be helpful for cops to build relationships with the community, or at least know who everyone is, so that they are virtually 0% likely to shoot someone they think is violent, who actually called 911 for help. In fact, police should be trained on how to safely apprehend violent criminals without killing them if possible, to further prevent unnecessary killing. |
de Economie › Vennootschapsbelasting
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordFlat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
Verkiezingen › Recht van Buitenlanders om te Stemmen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, enkel legale burgers zouden toestemming moeten hebben om te stemmen. |
Criminaliteit › Privégevangenissen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but prisons should be standardized and reformed according to available research on reforming prisoners. |
de Economie › De Noord-Amerikaanse Vrijhandelsovereenkomst
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Criminaliteit › Drukte in de gevangenis
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
Criminaliteit › Stemrechten voor criminelen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
Verkiezingen › Campagnefinanciering
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, maar sta donaties van vakbonden en non-profitorganisaties toe |
de Economie › Binnenlandse banen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Sociaal › Transsexueelatleten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee, atleten moeten concurreren op basis van het biologische geslacht dat staat vermeld op hun geboorteakte |
Het milieu › Fracken
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Gezondheidszorg › Marihuana
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, maar alleen voor medisch gebruik |
Sociaal › Vrouwen In Het Leger
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, but they should still have to meet the same requirements, and should not be drafted into combat roles. They should also be offered free birth control to prevent problems from rape by enemies. |
de Economie › Overheidspensioenen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, pas ze jaarlijks aan voor kosten van levensonderhoud |
Immigratie › Kundige immigranten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordVermeerderen |
behuizing › Daklozenkampen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Gezondheidszorg › Veilig Onderkomen
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, but they should not be put in a normal prison if they are willing to be rehabilitated. |
de Economie › Offshore bankieren
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but companies should not. |
de Economie › Staatseigendom
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordThat is fine, but the government should never be the majority stakeholder |
Gezondheidszorg › COVID arbeidsgezondheidspas
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
de Economie › Welzijn
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordMore. We should raise the minimum wage to a beginner's living wage and only provide welfare to those who are incapable of working and for up to 6 months in between jobs. People with repairable conditions should be actively getting treatment and doing all that they can to support themselves. The government should find ways besides direct funding from the government to help people get treatment when they can't afford it. For example, they can ask people to donate to charity, do crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, and hire a paid or unpaid (volunteer) worker to find ways to make money for the person, such as through GoFundMe. |
de Economie › Boerderij subsidies
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
de Economie › Tech-monopolies
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Binnenlands Beleid › Politieke reclame op sociale media
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNo, but they should not tailor the political advertising to only show to people who agree with it. This will increase political polarization and lead to war. |
de Economie › Tarieven
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Het milieu › Bedrijfssubsidies
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
de Economie › Drugstests Bijstand
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, and the government should require treatment, which will be paid for by the person paying what they can and the government finding a way to pay for the rest in ways other than directly funding it themselves. Terminate benefits where necessary. |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Buitenlandse hulp
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordDecrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
Immigratie › Dubbele Nationaliteit
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but only with allied countries. |
Immigratie › Burgerschapstest
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa, maar het zou alleen de basis en simpele onderwerpen moeten omvatten |
Immigratie › Assimilatie van immigranten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Binnenlands Beleid › Vlagverbranding
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, this is an act meant to signify aggression, which, in insignificant amount of cases, will escalate to worse things in the future, and it may cause fires. We should maintain at least some semblance of patriotism required. Because if they hate the country, then they are not loyal to it, and are likely to commit treason, which is rightfully punishable by death to prevent the overthrow and collapse of the government. |
Binnenlands Beleid › Netneutraliteit
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Gezondheidszorg › Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Gezondheidszorg › Vaccinpaspoorten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Hong Kong voortvluchtige uitlevering
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, but only for breaking laws that hurt people. |
Gezondheidszorg › Vaccinmandaten voor klanten
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
de Economie › Vierdaagse werkweek
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordLet's see what happens in the other countries and then experiment with it if it is worth it. It is worth it if it increases GDP and/or significantly improves mental health and family ties. |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Oekraïne en NAVO
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordYes, if they're willing to follow all its rules |
de Economie › Bitcoin
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
de Economie › Gedecentraliseerde Financiën
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordJa |
Buitenlandse Politiek › Financiële hulp van de Taliban
H>H Persoonlijk antwoordNee |
Hier is hoe u zich verhoudt tot deze kiezer op populaire politieke thema’s.
Hier is hoeveel u het met deze kiezer eens bent over elk onderwerp.
Gebaseerd op 1 vragen die voor jou meer belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 2 vragen die voor u meer belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 9 vragen die voor u meer belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 5 vragen die voor u meer belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 6 vragen die voor u enigszins belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 7 vragen die voor u enigszins belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 4 vragen die voor u enigszins belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 8 vragen die voor u enigszins belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 5 vragen die voor u enigszins belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 20 vragen die voor u enigszins belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 1 vragen die voor jou minder belangrijkst zijn.
Gebaseerd op 8 vragen die voor u minder belangrijkst zijn.
Hier is hoe je het vergelijkt met deze kiezer op de traditionele ideologische as.
iSideWith.com is ’s werelds meest populaire stemgids voor burgers om informatie te vinden over verkiezingen, politieke partijen, kandidaten, kiesdistricten en populaire politieke kwesties in hun land. Wij zijn onafhankelijk en niet gelieerd aan investeerders, aandeelhouders, politieke partijen of belangengroepen.
Ik begrijp dat het indienen van mijn e-mailadres iSideWith.com in staat stelt mij belangrijke meldingen via e-mail te sturen. Lees ons privacybeleid voor meer informatie.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Alle rechten voorbehouden. Door deze site te gebruiken, aanvaardt u onze gebruikersovereenkomst en ons privacybeleid . iSideWith.com kan een deel van de omzet verdienen met producten die via onze site zijn gekocht als onderdeel van onze aangesloten partnerschappen met detailhandelaren. Het materiaal op deze site mag niet worden gereproduceerd, gedistribueerd, verzonden, in de cache opgeslagen of anderszins gebruikt, behalve met voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van iSideWith.com.